Please GOOGLE judge juergen “skipper” koetter’s corruption photos to get about 50 LINKS to this BLOG! Dripping water can pierce through rocks. Rest assured that sooner or later, truth will prevail!
Deuteronomy 16:19 — You shall not distort justice; you shall not be partial, and you shall not take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and perverts the words of the righteous.
Mr. Rainey: Even if you are blindfolded, you can still feel the stacks of banknotes and hear the jingling of millions of gold coins!
RE: RAINEY’S RESTITUTION ORDER IS VOID; IT MUST BE VACATED!
REPLY TO CITGO’S CRIME VICTIMS’ INQUIRIES:
MANDAMUS under 18 U.S.C. § 3771 may be time-barred, but a VOID Order or Judgment must be set aside. This statute says an appeal must be made within 14 days to the Court of Appeals following the denial. This is a vague statement so can you define the circumstances under which this is law? I know Void orders would be unaffected but from what I read, Void judgments are matter of court opinion. So far no one has agreed that what they did in your case represents an actual VOID judgment or at least it was never declared Void by anyone. So the catch all thing in this statute is if justice has not been done.
“I think your attacks are the only way that is effective, but I doubt Rainey will suffer much from the attacks. He just ignores them.”
18 U.S.C. § 3771: 14 days’ limitation is applicable to this Crime Victims’ Rights Act only.
The following case law should supersede the 14 days’ limitation of 18 U.S.C. § 3771:
Rainey’s violations are against the victims’ right to due process protected by the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution. As a result, the restitution order is VOID ab initio. It must be vacated. “Judgments entered where court lacked either subject matter or personal jurisdiction, or that were otherwise entered in violation of due process of law, must be set aside, Jaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994, 158 F.R.D. 278.” Please refer to: Void Orders: Fraud Upon the Court, No Jurisdiction/No Authority, No Due Process, No Res Judicata, No Laches, No Appeal Necessary Posted on June 15, 2012.
“Void judgment is one rendered by court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or acted in manner inconsistent with due process,” U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5.
The requirements of due process not only include notice, but also include an opportunity to be heard in a meaningful way, and judicial review. Grannis v. Ordean, 234U.S. 385, 394 (1914).
Every person is entitled to an opportunity to be heard in a court of law upon every question involving his rights or interests, before he is affected by any judicial decision on the question. Earle v McVeigh, 91US503,23 LEd 398.
Evans v Corporate Services, 207 Ill.App.3d 297, 565 N.E.2d 724 (2nd Dist. 1990) (“a void judgment, order or decree may be attacked at any time or in any court, either directly or collaterally.”)
Oak Park Nat. Bank v Peoples Gas Light & Coke Col, 46 Ill.App.2d 385, 197 N.E.2d 73, 77 (1st Dist. 1964) (“that judgment is void and may be attacked at any time in the same or any other court, by the parties or by any other person who is affected thereby.”).
My federal case is crystal clear. Please read my Open Letter to Judge John D. Rainey and Judge Janis Graham Jack of Texas, Addressing and Suing Them as Private Citizens Posted on June 10, 2012. I count on Rules Enabling Act Rule 1-041(E)(2) and 28 USC Section 1915(d) and emphasize the word SHALL, which means it’s mandatory for the judge to comply with the specific statutes.
My state court cases center on Koetter’s six VOID Orders/Judgments, which are undeniable.
He just colluded with Plaintiffs’ attorney Randall W. Hill, who lied under oath, committed perjury and fraud on the court.
Job 13:9 Would it turn out well if He examined you? Could you deceive Him as you might deceive a mortal? Mr. Rainey: Could you? The Citgo crime victims might have been deceived by you, could you deceive Him and your conscience?
Job 4:8 As I have observed, those who plow evil and those who sow trouble reap it. Don’t you believe that you who plowed evil and you who sowed trouble would reap it, John?
The truth is between your stories and
my stories. The judge is supposed to be neutral!
TO BE CONTINUED.
Paul Chen
MANDAMUS: VOID Orders/Judgments 