Mr. Rainey: Did you ignore 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) & Rules Enabling Act Rule 1-041(E)(2) or were simply ignorant of these two rules?

This is a summary of Open Letter to Judge John D. Rainey and Judge Janis Graham Jack of Texas, Addressing and Suing Them as Private Citizens Posted on June 10, 2012; PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR REINSTATEMENT OF THE SIX COMPLAINTS Posted on April 22, 2012; AMENDED PAUL CHEN’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Posted on May 13, 2013 and other documents relating to 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) & Rules Enabling Act Rule 1-041(E)(2) filed in the records of various federal and state cases. Each and every statement is substantiated by sufficient facts and applicable law. All the court documents have been or will be submitted under oath. The purpose of publishing the posts here at WORDPRESS is to teach myself and those similarly situated how to protect our rights guaranteed by our Constitution, i.e., MANDAMUS: VOID Orders/Judgments: PREPARE TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITHOUT A LAWYER.

If you read the above-cited posts, you will have a general idea why Mr. Rainey was and still is absolutely wrong in rendering those orders without subject matter jurisdiction. I will present the two issues here more briefly, concisely, and systematically, which is required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I admit that as a layman, I was not aware of it until July 12, 2010 when Mr. Rainey pointed it out in his VOID Dismissal Order! You win some; you lose some, John!

1. Under the Supreme Law of the Land, whenever a judge acts when the judge does not have subject-matter jurisdiction, the judge is engaged in an act of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5L.Ed 257 (1821).
2. After a ten-month delay in granting me to proceed in forma pauperis on 2/13/06 in response to my 4/14/05 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, you violated 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 (d) without requiring the Clerk to issue summons and serve all process. Section 1915 (d) provides, in pertinent part: “The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases.” Consequently, you were in complete absence of subject matter or personal jurisdiction. Without of subject matter, you have been engaged in many acts of treason since 2/13/06.Being a traitor, you are entitled to a just and fair trial. Though you are stripped of judicial immunity, you should enjoy the same privileges of handcuffs, standing behind bars as the other traitors.
3.  

 In ancient times, you would have ended up being hanged or executed!

  

 

I’m a traitor, but I don’t consider myself a traitor. — Aldrich Ames (former Central Intelligence Agency officer and analyst and agent for the Soviet Union and later Russia — Life imprisonment (without parole)

“Neither am I,” responded John D. Rainey.

Ames’ mug shot, taken on the day of his arrest 

 

TO BE CONTINUED.

Paul Chen